Legal Opinion

Carson v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1988No. 87-201PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Justice.

Kelly Carson, convicted of auto burglary, appeals from the trial court’s closing-argument rejection of his use of a nonintro-duced prop as demonstrative evidence. We affirm the discretionary decision of the trial court in denial of the demonstration which was to be a visibility test of the cord on a radar detector. 1 In essence, this is a sufficiency-of-the-evidence jury verdict with denied strategy of defense counsel directly presented as the appeal issue.

On November 21, 1986, Ms. Cindy Pater parked her Trans Am vehicle near the Wonder Bar in Casper, and someone thereafter,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Arturo M. CampaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. Oldham v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Boyd v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Mayer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. AhloHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Duffy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Bigelow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Carson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Duffy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mondello v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API