Legal Opinion

Duffy v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1990No. 87-160PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The double jeopardy implications of separate sentences for aiding and abetting aggravated robbery and for conspiracy to commit burglary present the central issue in this case. Questions also are raised „as to whether the sentences imposed, nine years, eleven months and twenty-nine days to ten years to run consecutively to twenty-four years, eleven months and twenty-nine days to twenty-five years, constitute a denial of due process because the appellant, Scott Duffy, is foreclosed from the right to earn statutory good time credits, essential for an early parole, and amount to a…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cook v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Calene v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Snow v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Jaime Solis v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API