In Re: Janssen Biotech, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Chief Judge.
Janssen Biotech, Inc., and New York University (collectively, “Janssen”) appeal from a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”), Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) resulting from an ex parte reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,284,471 (“’471 patent”). The Board affirmed the rejection of claims 1-7 of the ’471 patent as unpatentable under the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting. Because the claims are barred under that doctrine, we affirm.
I
“The doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting is intended to prevent the extension of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Opticon, Inc., and Opto ElectronicsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- In re BergCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Immunex Corporation v. Sandoz Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Natural Alternatives Int'l, Inc. v. IancuCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma LimitedDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023