Legal Opinion
Vogt v. Emerson Electric Co.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided August 10, 1992No. 3:89-cv-01008PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ECHOLS, District Judge.
After duly considering the pleadings and file in this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Amend the Pretrial Order is hereby granted, the Parties’ Joint Request for a waiver of Local Rule 12(c)(6) regarding the testimony of expert witnesses is hereby denied, and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to deny the parties’ cross motions for partial summary judgment is hereby adopted.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
SANDIDGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
June 11, 1992.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. sec. 686(b)(1)(B), this matter…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cassidy v. Spectrum RentsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1997
- Boyd v. Youth Opportunity Investments, LLC (TV1)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022