Legal Opinion
People v. Bonilla
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 1, 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his arrest was not based upon probable cause and, therefore, the physical evidence seized from his vehicle and "the showup identification” should have been suppressed. We disagree. The facts and circumstances known to the arresting officers were sufficient to lead a reasonable person who possessed the same expertise as the officers to conclude that a robbery had been committed at the Kwik-Fil station and that defendant and his codefendant were its perpetrators (see, People v McRay, 51 NY2d 594, 602).
Defendant’s remaining…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. McRayNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. LombardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. ShanisNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RicchiutiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MorriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. SeelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. CarrAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. LawrenceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006