People v. Shanis
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. From the outset the defendant admitted striking the decedent. The primary question was whether he was justified in doing so (Penal Law, § 35.15). The defense submitted testimony that the decedent not only provoked the defendant by heaping abuse on him and his wife, but that he also proceeded to assault both of them before the defendant struck any blows. And the defendant, taking the stand in his own behalf, stated that he acted as he did only ‘ ‘ to prevent him [the decedent] from swinging at me and hurting me or my wife any further,” The court, in charging on this point, told the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- People v. NisonoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- People v. . EspositoNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
3Cited by54 opinions
- People v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. ColonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. GriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.