Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Worth County Drainage District, No. 1

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Worth County. — John M. Dawson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBland, J.

This is an action for damages. The facts show that defendant is a drainage district organized under the Drainage Law of 1913 (Laws of 1913, p, 2321). In May, 1920, defendant in carrying out its plan of drainage dug its main ditch over a much used public road completely obstructing it. Defendant failed to erect a suitable bridge within ten days after crossing the road with its ditch as required by the statute (Sec. 4406, R. S. 1919). The board let a contract to build the bridge but the material was delayed, so persons in the neighborhood, including a member of defendant’s board of supervisors,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bradbury v. Vandalia Levee & Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Mound City Land & Stock Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. Morrison v. MoreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. Squaw Creek Drainage District v. TurneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  5. Kochtitzky v. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Page v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  2. Todd v. Curators of Mo. UniversitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Anderson v. Inter-River Drainage & Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  4. State Ex Rel. Hausgen v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923
  5. Sigler v. Inter-River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API