Legal Opinion

State v. Wiggins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1972No. 7214SC749PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Judge.

Defendant did not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence in the trial court in the manner prescribed by G.S. 15-173. He contends on appeal, however, that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction for the offense of armed robbery. “The sufficiency of the evidence of the State in a criminal case is reviewable upon appeal without regard to whether a motion has been made pursuant to G.S. 15-173 in the trial court.” G.S. 15-173.1. See also State v. Conrad, 275 N.C. 342, 168 S.E. 2d 39; State v. Davis, 273 N.C. 349, 160 S.E. 2d 75; State v. Robinson, 13 N.C. App. 200,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. BentonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. State v. Jarrell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. State v. . KnottsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. PryorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API