Legal Opinion
(HC) Sisounthone v. Neuschmid
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 6, 2023No. 2:18-cv-03181Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VANNA SISOUNTHONE, No. 2:18-cv-3181 DAD AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROBERT NEUSCHMID, WARDEN, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner has moved for reconsideration of the court’s order directing him to file a motion 18 for stay of these proceedings pursuant either to Rhines v. Weber,
544 U.S. 269
(2005) or Kelly v. 19 Small,
315 F.3d 1063
(9th Cir. 2002). ECF No. 23. For the reasons stated below, the motion will 20 be denied. Consistent with the court’s order issued November 8, 2022 (ECF No. 20), petitioner…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- McHenry v. RenneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.