Legal Opinion

Rose City Co. v. Langloe

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBossman, J.

At the time of his death, J. J. Bichardson owed the property described in the mortgage. By the provisions of his will (for a copy see Bussone v. Marsh, 140 Or. 331 (12 P. (2d) 329)) he devised these premises to Sarah Palmer Bichardson, his widow, the mortgagor. In the Bnssone case, wherein the identical will now before us was construed, we held that the will passed to the widow a life estate with power to alienate the fee, and that upon her death what remained went to the children. We remain entirely satisfied with that conclusion. The new question presented by the children in this appeal is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kent v. MorrisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  2. Swarthout v. . RanierNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  4. Beakey v. KnutsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Van Tassell v. Jefferson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Howell v. DeadyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1939
  2. Anderson v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API