Legal Opinion

State v. Handy

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1990No. 16535PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

In this appeal we affirm convictions on three counts of sexual contact with a child under the age of sixteen.

Defendant/appellant Malcolm Handy (Handy) was charged and convicted of having sexual contact 1 with three young girls. K.R. (age fourteen) testified that Handy touched her breasts and vagina through her clothes about ten times; C.C.’s (age fourteen) testimony was that Handy “grabbed my boob” and told her “I see what I like and I’ll touch it if I want” (he also told her that if she were not related he would get her to sleep with him); C.R.’s (age eleven) testimony was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. Bobby G. SplainCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  2. Enchanted World Doll Museum v. BuskohlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. DaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BartlettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. KiddSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BaskerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. SpirySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. JonesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. WallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API