Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Thurber

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 9, 1944No. Civil Action No. 103PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, District Judge.

This is an action by the plaintiff, Clayton V. Hamilton, against defendants Northwest Underwriters, hereafter called Underwriters, The General Insurance Company of America, hereafter called General, and H. P. Thurber on a contract to recover commissions on insurance premiums. It is based on a contract executed December 1, 1937, by Underwriters and the plaintiff. The plaintiff, a citizen of California, claimed a sum in excess of $3,000 from Underwriters and Thurber, citizens of Minnesota and General, a citizen of Washington.

The plaintiff from 1919 to 1942 conducted a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gunning v. CooleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Elzig v. GudwangenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. Kerr & Elliott v. Green Mountain Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  4. Weinstein v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Pennig v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bernstein v. OlianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API