Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mickeviciute v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 28, 2003No. 02-9516Published

1DissentMeCONNELL, Circuit Judge

A decision not to reopen deportation proceedings is in the discretion of the agency, and must not be overturned unless that discretion is abused. INS v. Abudu, 485 U.S. 94, 108 S.Ct. 904, 99 L.Ed.2d 90 (1988). An abuse of discretion may be found only when the Board’s decision “provides no rational explanation, inexplicably departs from established policies, is devoid of any reasoning, or contains only summary or conclusory statements.” Osei v. INS, 805 F.8d 1205, 1208 (10th Cir.2002). I cannot agree with the panel majority that this high standard has been satisfied.

I

When reviewing the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha WangSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Hakim Iddir v. Immigration And Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API