Legal Opinion

Thurston v. Salisbury Zoning Board of Adjustment

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 1974No. 7419SC831Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

By motion filed prior to argument, respondents move to dismiss petitioner’s appeal, among other reasons, for failure of petitioner to comply with G.S. 1-282, which provides, in pertinent part:

“The appellant shall cause to be prepared a concise statement of the case, embodying the instructions of the judge as signed by him, if there be an exception thereto, and the request of the counsel of the parties for instructions if there be any exception on account of the granting or withholding thereof, and stating separately, in articles numbered, the errors alleged. A copy of this…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Cummings v. . HoffmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Peebles v. . BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. State v. DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API