Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. United States Postal Service
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
In this suit brought under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., Plaintiffs seek to. supplement the administrative record. The documents that Plaintiffs seek to include were not before, or considered by, the- decision-makers when they made the final agency decisions challenged here. Further, the documents are not “adverse” to the agency. Thus, the motion will be denied.
I. FACTS
Three mailings by the Plaintiffs—Sears, Roebuck and Co.; Segerdahl Graphics, Inc.; and Aspen Marketing Services, LLC—resulted in three…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- American Wildlands v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- CTS Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Pacific Shores Subdivision California Water District v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- District Hospital Partners v. Sylvia Mathews BurwellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Fund for Animals v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.