Legal Opinion
Fund for Animals v. Williams
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 28, 2005No. Civil Action 03-0677 (RMU)PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting In Part and Denying In Part the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production and/or Supplementation of the Administrative Record
I. INTRODUCTION
This case comes before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion to compel production and/or supplementation of the administrative record. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant Fish and Wildlife Service (the “FWS” or the “Service”) failed to produce the administrative record pertaining to (1) the 2000-2005 Strategic Plan prepared by the FWS pursuant to the Government Performance and Results Act (the “GPRA”) and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Pacific Shores Subdivision California Water District v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Tafas v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Planetspace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Sara Lee Corp. v. American Bakers Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Blue Ocean Institute v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.