Legal Opinion

Marinoff v. Belmont Burlap Bag Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 30, 1941No. Appeal, 246Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldkige, J.,

The principal question raised in this appeal is whether Marinoff and Eskin, the plaintiffs, as holders in due course of three trade acceptances, averred and proved notice of dishonor to defendants, Belmont Burlap Bag Co., Inc., Abraham Mackler, and Samuel Mackler, as indorsers, within the time prescribed by section 103 of the Negotiable Instruments Law approved May 16, 1901, P. L. 194, 56 PS 225.

A trial without a jury was had before Tumolillo, J., who found for the plaintiffs. A motion for a new trial and judgment n.o.v. was thereafter refused and judgment was entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chestnut Street National Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  2. Bell SEC. of Banking v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Harr, Secty. of Banking v. EdsallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Packard v. WoodruffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Marwitz's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API