Legal Opinion

School District No. v. Marine National Exchange Bank of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1960PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

It is fundamental that every presumption must be indulged to sustain the constitutionality of a law if at all possible, that all reasonable doubts must be resolved in favor of its validity.

As stated in Payne v. Racine (1935), 217 Wis. 550, 561, 259 N. W. 437:

“Before a statute can be said to be unconstitutional, the statute must lack in public purpose ‘so clear and palpable as to be perceptible by every mind at the first blush.’ This was said by Mr. Chief Justice Dixon, who sat in the constitutional convention and helped frame the charter of our state. Brodhead v. Milwaukee, 19 Wis. *624, *652. ‘We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Borgnis v. Falk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Earles v. WellsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Payne v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Balch v. BeachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  5. State ex rel. Marinette, Tomahawk & Western Railway Co. v. Common Council of TomahawkWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hammermill Paper Co. v. La PlanteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Gottlieb v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. StittWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Bowman v. BarczakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State Ex Rel. Building Owners & Managers Ass'n of Milwaukee v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API