Legal Opinion
Berger Bros. Electric Motors, Inc. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKimball, J.
The action, is upon two public liability policies issued by the defendant to the plaintiff. The case has been submitted to the court for decision upon an agreed state of facts. .
The Central New York Power Corporation, which furnished electrical energy .in the county of Oswego, having determined to substitute energy of a frequency of sixty cycles for energy of twenty-five cycles, contracted with the plaintiff, an electrical contracting company, to make the change-over of the equipment used by its customers. Among the customers was one George F. Chillson, the operator of a large commercial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Loveman, Joseph Loeb v. New Amsterdam CasualtySupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Tulare County Power Co. v. Pacific Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Jackson v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Service Welding & MacHine Company, Inc., and Great American Indemnity Company of New York v. Michigan Mutual Liability Company of Detroit, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- Weissblum v. Glens Falls InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961
- Senn Products Corp. v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1943
- Warner v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1959