Legal Opinion

ROXANNE H. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1995No. A069540PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petitioner Roxanne H. is the mother of four dependent children of the juvenile court, Jessica G., Samantha G., Brandi G., and O’Ryan G. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 39.IB, petitioner filed a petition for extraordinary relief seeking review of the trial court’s order setting a permanency planning hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. In her petition, she acknowledges that she was “not in compliance with the court-ordered [reunification] services agreement”; however, she claims she “has now stabilized her life and is in a position or…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jonathan M. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Anthony D. v. Superior Court CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. In re R.C. CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. S.C. v. Superior Court CA6California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API