Legal Opinion

Jonathan M. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1995No. A071305PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

Petitioner Jonathan M. is the father of Renea M., a dependent child of the juvenile court. Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 39.IB, petitioner filed a petition for extraordinary relief seeking review of the trial court’s order setting a permanency planning hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. The hearing is currently scheduled for November 16, 1995. We dismiss the petition for the untimeliness of the rule 39.1B notice of intent. (Rule 39.1B(f).)

Both petitioner and real party in interest Mendocino County Department of Social Services (the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. ROXANNE H. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Department of Children & Family Services v. Jasmin S.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Anthony D. v. Superior Court CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. In re R.C. CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API