Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Blackwell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 7, 1994No. 93-01486; CA A83105PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that awarded claimant a carrier-paid attorney fee under ORS 656.386(1) for having succeeded, without a hearing, in having SAIF issue an express acceptance of claimant’s knee conditions requiring treatment. We affirm.

Claimant injured his left knee at work on May 27, 1992. The injury was initially diagnosed as a strain. By written notice dated June 16, 1992, SAIF accepted a non-disabling claim for left knee strain due to hyperextension.

In the meantime, claimant’s doctor began to suspect a ligament injury. Claimant had surgery on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Jones v. OREGON STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Jones v. Oregon State Correctional InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Nava v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  4. SAIF Corp. v. AldingerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. SAIF Corp. v. HolznerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API