Legal Opinion

State v. Shaw

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 24, 2022No. A168553PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

746 Submitted April 29, 2020, vacated and remanded February 24, 2022 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CLIFFORD WILLIAM SHAW, Defendant-Appellant. Lane County Circuit Court 18CR43193; A168553

507 P3d 280

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for felon in possession of a firearm (FIP). He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to dis- miss the FIP charge on the ground of double jeopardy, contending that the state’s subsequent prosecution of FIP should be barred because the prosecutor knew or reasonably should have known of the facts relevant to the FIP charge…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  3. United States v. Carmine AvellinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ClydeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. State v. ClydeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API