Legal Opinion
Hodges v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided September 2, 2003No. CIV.A. 3:03CV87Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUDSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court as a “hybrid” case under Section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185. Defendants Philip Morris USA, Inc. (“Philip Morris”) and Local No. 203-T Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC (the “Union”) have filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. All parties have fully briefed the issue, and the Court is of the opinion that oral argument is unnecessary. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment.
L BACKGROUND
Pla…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- James E. Thompson v. Aluminum Company of America United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio Clc United Steelworkers Local 303Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.