Legal Opinion

State v. Zadeh

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 3, 2020No. 25/19PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

State of Maryland v. Hussain Ali Zadeh, No. 25, September 2019 Term. Opinion by Hotten, J. CRIMINAL LAW—JOINDER OR SEVERANCE OF CO-DEFENDANTS— LIMITING INSTRUCTIONS AND OTHER REMEDIES The Court of Appeals held that the cumulative effect of the introduction of non- mutually admissible evidence unfairly prejudiced Respondent. The trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion for severance, because the limiting instructions were insufficient to cure the prejudice that resulted from the introduction and admission of the non-mutually admissible evidence. Under Hines, severance is…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zadeh v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2023
  2. v. GutierrezColorado Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API