Worker's Compensation Claim of Padilla v. Lovern's, Inc.

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Daniel R. Padilla appeals from the district court’s order which affirmed the hearing examiner’s denial of benefits for Padilla’s back injury.

We affirm.

Issues

Padilla presents two issues:

A. The worker’s compensation benefits awarded to Mr. Padilla were subject to the doctrine of finality and as such should not have been revoked by the office of administrative hearings.

B. The worker’s compensation benefits awarded to Mr. Padilla should not have been revoked by the office of administrative hearings as there was no medical testimony supporting employer’s position.

Facts

Padill…