Legal Opinion

Farman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1992No. 92-115PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Chief Justice.

Appellant Dade R. Farman appeals from the district court’s order affirming the hearing examiner’s decision to deny any worker’s compensation benefits to Appellant. The hearing examiner denied all benefits because Appellant failed to prove that his untimely claim did not prejudice the Workers’ Compensation Division and, alternatively, because sufficient evidence did not exist to show that Appellant’s injuries arose out of his employment.

We affirm.

Appellant presents the following issues for our review:

The district court judge erred in his findings

I. In denying the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Frank Peter Balistrieri, Steve Disalvo, and Dennis Librizzi, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Dorothy Willner v. University of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  4. Cline v. SawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Trout v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Devous v. Wyoming State Board of Medical ExaminersWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Romero v. Davy McKee Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Ex Parte Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API