Legal Opinion

Moss & Urschel v. Clark

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1935No. 4703PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SELLERS, Justice.

Moss & Urschel, a- partnership, brought this suit upon an alleged oral contract to recover of W. G. Clark and W. Y. Rockwell one-half the reasonable cost of drilling a certain oil well, and one-half the expenses of standardizing two oil wells, and also one-half the expense of operating the lease. Plaintiffs sought the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien on the lease property. By an instrument styled a supplemental petition, plaintiffs sought to recover certain additional items of expense which occurred after the suit was filed and before the trial.

The defendants answered by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wagner Supply Co. v. BatemanTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Elrod v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  3. Indiahoma Refining Co. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Gilbert v. FontaineCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warner v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Long v. HitzelbergerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Wight v. MossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Long v. HitzelbergerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API