Legal Opinion

Liddle v. Petty

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 1991No. 90-596PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

Jack H. Petty appeals from a July 23, 1990, judgment of the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County, Montana, awarding damages to Thomas W. and Constance L. Liddle for breach of a contract for deed. We affirm.

The issue is whether the District Court erred by holding that the vendee, Jack Petty, rather than the vendors, Thomas and Constance Liddle, had materially breached the contract for deed and that Petty was not entitled to suspend payments.

I

In 1981 Thomas and Constance Liddle purchased a small farm located in Flathead County on Highway 2 across from the water…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Suburban Homes Co. v. NorthMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Sjoberg v. KravikMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Wise v. SebenaMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Berry v. RomainMontana Supreme Court · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eschenbacher v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Olympus Hills Shopping Center, Ltd. v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  3. Norwood v. Service Distributing, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Yellowstone II Development Group, Inc. v. First American Title InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  5. King Resources, Inc. v. OliverMontana Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API