Legal Opinion

Fay v. Crozer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 2, 1910No. 165PublishedCited by 14 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT O.P THE UNITED STATES FOR THE •SOUTHERN DISTRICT .OP WEST VIRGINIA'.' The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Per curiam

This is a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the'Southern District of West .Virginia, brought directly to this court, and as such falls within the rule that the. controversy must be substantial and the question open to discussion.. Tested by that rule, we think the writ of error must be dismissed on the authority of King v. Mullins, 171 U. S. 404; King v. West Virginia, 216 U. S. 92. And see King v. Panther Lumber Company, 171 U. S. 437; Swann v. State, 188 U. S. 739, It is contended' that the question of the forfeiture of plaintiffs’ title under the constitution of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. MullinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. King v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. King v. Panther Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Kentucky Union Co. v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Straus v. FoxworthNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Jones v. Buffalo Creek Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. International Life Insurance v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API