Legal Opinion

Ontario State Bank v. Tibbits

California Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1889No. 13007PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. The findings found that the plaintiff’s original articles of incorporation were filed in the office of the. county clerk of San Bernardino County. The further facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Vanclief, C.

This action was to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant Amelia Tibbits to secure her promissory note to the plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of this state. The court below found that the note and mortgage were made and executed as alleged in the complaint, and that no part of the debt had been paid, but dismissed the action solely upon the ground that the plaintiff had never filed in the office of the county clerk of San Bernardino, in which the mortgaged property was situated, a copy of the copy of its articles of incorporation, as required by section…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Sweeney v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Larco v. ClementsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Southern Pacific Railroad v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Thompson v. LyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Valley Lumber & Manufacturing Co. v. DriesselIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. California Savings & Loan Society v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Kadota Fig Ass'n of Producers v. Case-Swayne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Rudneck v. Southern California Metal & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Madison Fork Ranch v. L & B Lodge Pole Timber ProductsMontana Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API