Legal Opinion

Totten v. Lampenfeld

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1983No. 560PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROWLEY, Judge:

This is an appeal from the judgment entered after a court en banc dismissed exceptions taken from the general decision rendered by the trial judge after a nonjury trial. For the reasons more fully set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

Appellees William A. Totten and Jean N. Totten commenced this action in assumpsit on December 12, 1979. Appellees sought to recover from Appellant Robert Lam-penfeld the amount of $3,500.00 plus interest and costs due to appellant’s alleged wrongful failure to complete painting and redecoration work which appellant had agreed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merion Spring Co. v. Muelles Hnos. Garcia Torres, S.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co. v. LiberatiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. First Pennsylvania Savings Ass'n v. Four Seasons Racquet Club, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Harton v. HildebrandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ramalingam v. Keller Williams Realty Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Ramalingam, G. v. Keller Williams Realty GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API