Google, Inc. v. Central Mfg. Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*492ORDER
Leo Stoller is a familiar litigant, to say the least. As we have previously remarked, litigation is central to his business strategy: he claims a superior right to countless trademarks and then seeks to thwart genuine users from registering their marks or threatens litigation if he is not paid a “licensing fee.” See, e.g., Central Manufacturing, Incorporated v. Brett, 492 F.3d 876, 880 (7th Cir.2007); S Indus., Inc. v. Space-Age Techs., 116 Fed.Appx. 752 (7th Cir.2004); S Indus., Inc. v. Centra 2000, Inc., 249 F.3d 625 (7th Cir.2001). In this case when Stoller targeted big-gun Google,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Support Systems International, Inc. v. Richard MackCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Bruce K. Cable, as Debtor in Possession v. Ivy Tech State CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- In the Matter Of: Synthroid Marketing LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Eugene K. Biesek v. Soo Line Railroad Company and Canadian Pacific RailwayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Forbes v. Forbes (In Re Forbes)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.