Legal Opinion

Backenstoch v. Young

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 27, 1926No. 15698PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This cause is appealed from the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, .and the defendants in error have filed their motion to dismiss the appeal for ■the reason that the case-made was not filed by the court clerk of the trial court with the other papers in the case, as required by section 785, Compiled Oklahoma Statutes, 1921.

Among other things, this section provides:

“* * * The case an(j amendments shall, upon three days’ notice, be submitted to the judge, who shall settle and sign the same, and cause i't to be attested by the clerk, and the seal of the court to be thereto attached. It shall…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. BerrymanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API