Legal Opinion

Miller v. Berryman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1934No. 23462PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CUBIAM.

The plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff in the lower court, appealed this cause from a judgment pronounced in favor of defendant in error.

The case-made was certified by the court clerk, settled and signed by the trial judge, and attested by the clerk with the seal of the court thereto attached, but there is no filing mark in the case-made to indicate that the same was filed with the papers in the ease as provided in section 785, O. 0. S. 1921 (section 534, O. S. 1931).

Among other things, this section of the statute provides:

“* * * The case and amendments shall, upon three days’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Small v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Hall v. Phoenix Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BonhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. BurrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Backenstoch v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harner v. BeeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Atkinson v. BurkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API