Legal Opinion
Jo-Ann Scott Cooley v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided September 9, 2020No. 19-cv-679-PBPublished
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jo-Ann Scott Cooley Case No. 19-cv-679-PB v. Opinion No.
2020 DNH 157
Andrew Saul,1 Commissioner, Social Security Administration MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Jo-Ann Scott Cooley challenges the denial of her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“Section 405(g)”). She contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred by failing to properly conduct the full residual functional capacity (“RFC”) analysis at step four of the five-step evaluation required by
20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(a)(4)(iv). The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.