St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Bridges

This is the second appeal of this case. The first appeal was reported in 156 Miss. 206,125 So. 423. The judgment of lower court on that appeal was strictly in conformity with the directions of this court contained in the opinion.

When the mandate of this court reached the lower court, it exercised option 1 contained in the opinion and set forth in the judgment of this court, and entered its judgment accordingly, thereby declining to interfere with the original verdict and judgment of the lower court, and thereby indicating to this court its judgment that the verdict herein was not excessive.

Upo…