Legal Opinion

St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Bridges

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1930No. 28197PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

In the city of Memphis, appellant maintains and operates a large switchyard, called the Yale yard. This yard is what is known as a freight classification gravity yard, and is designed and used for breaking up incoming freight trains, and in assembling the several cars thereof into classified tracks, according to the ultimate destination of the respective cars. There are eighteen of such separate classification tracks, but for the purpose of this case tracks numbered eleven and twelve only are necessary to be particularly mentioned.

The general design of this yard is such that a switch engine…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Sussman, Wormser & Co. v. Sea Food Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Tendall v. DavisMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Gulf, M. N.R. Co. v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Kelly v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1856

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Justice v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Glenn v. HerringMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State Highway Commission v. ChathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1935
  4. White v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Standard Oil Co. v. FranksMississippi Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API