Legal Opinion
Uransky v. . D.D., E.B. B.R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 14, 1890PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The recovery had was for damages sustained by the plaintiff, a married woman, by reason of personal injuries received while a passenger on defendant's road.
Presumptively, damages for negligently diminishing the earning capacity of a married woman belong to her husband, and, when she seeks to recover such damages, the complaint must contain an allegation that for some reason she is entitled to the fruits of her own labor; or, if she seeks to recover damages for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ehrgott v. . Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Gumb v. Twenty-Third Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kleiner v. . Third Avenue R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Enid City Ry. Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Geoghegan v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Sealey v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.