Legal Opinion
Ferrostaal Metals Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided June 26, 1987No. Court 86-12-01610PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
DiCARLO, Judge:
The question presented in this case is whether plaintiffs importation of steel sheet which has been annealed and galvanized in New Zealand by a process known as “continuous hot-dip galvanizing” using full hard cold rolled steel sheet from Japan is covered by the Arrangement Between the Government of Japan and the Government of the United States of America Concerning Trade in Certain Steel Products (“Arrangement”). The Court holds that the merchandise is not covered by the Arrangement since the operations performed in New Zealand constituted a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States Cane Sugar Refiners' Ass'n v. BlockCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Lowa, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- National Juice Products Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- The Torrington Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Traveler Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Koru North America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.