Legal Opinion

Dale A. Crull and Theresa M. Crull, Husband and Wife v. Gem Insurance Company, a Utah Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1995No. 94-15159PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

The plaintiffs’ employer “established” an “employee welfare benefit plan” under ERISA. The plaintiffs sued the insurer to recover benefits allegedly owed them under the plan. They pled their claims under state law, but those claims were preempted by ERISA. The plaintiffs also requested that their state law claims be treated as claims for relief under ERISA’s civil enforcement scheme. The District Court granted summary judgment to the defendant without considering the plaintiffs’ alternate request. We remand to permit the District Court to consider whether the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Karen Hansen v. Group Health CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Jayedeane Thompson v. American Home Assurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. Platte Anchor Bolt, Inc. v. IHI, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2004

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API