Legal Opinion · Dissent

Needham v. Coordinated Apparel Group, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 28, 2002No. 99-360Published

1DissentAmestoy, C.J.

I agree that the Congressional subcommittee hearing report was erroneously admitted, but I disagree with the ultimate conclusion of the majority that its admission compels reversal because “defendants were denied a fair trial.” I therefore respectfully dissent.

No task of an appellate court is more difficult than attempting to assess from a cold record the fairness of a trial. The challenge is particularly difficult when, as here, experienced trial counsel for both parties test the bounds of advocacy in an emotionally charged case involving traumatic injury to a young child. I do not quarrel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Burlington Northern Railroad v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Danny T. Greenway v. The Buffalo Hilton Hotel, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  4. State v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
  5. Haynes v. Golub Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API