Needham v. Coordinated Apparel Group, Inc.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1DissentAmestoy, C.J.
I agree that the Congressional subcommittee hearing report was erroneously admitted, but I disagree with the ultimate conclusion of the majority that its admission compels reversal because “defendants were denied a fair trial.” I therefore respectfully dissent.
No task of an appellate court is more difficult than attempting to assess from a cold record the fairness of a trial. The challenge is particularly difficult when, as here, experienced trial counsel for both parties test the bounds of advocacy in an emotionally charged case involving traumatic injury to a young child. I do not quarrel…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Burlington Northern Railroad v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Danny T. Greenway v. The Buffalo Hilton Hotel, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- State v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1984
- Haynes v. Golub Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.