Legal Opinion

Bosley v. Farquar

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1827PublishedCited by 14 opinions

ERROR to the Washington Circuit Court.—Action oh the case by Farquar and Collins agaiiist Bosley, sheriff of Orange county, for a false return to a writ of fieri facias. Plea, the general issue. Yerdict and judgment for the plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Farquar and Collins in their decláration against Bosley, show thé rcboveiy of a judgment in their favour against AT. Stephen, for 138 dollars and 92 cents; and the issuing of á fieri facias thereon, which was placed in the hands of Bosley as sheriff; averring that Stephen had sufficient property to satisfy said execution; hut that Bosley refused to levy the execution j and falsely returned it not levied, because the plaintiffs would not give him a bond of indemnity; and averring also, that the sheriff never requested a bond of indemnity of the plaintiffs. The defendant pleaded not guilty.…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. LowndesThe Superior Court of New York City · 1829
  2. Wilson v. HustonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1816

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Aurora Fire Insurance v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Crocker v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Parmlee v. SloanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. State ex rel. O'Bryan v. KoontzSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  5. Bledsoe v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API