Legal Opinion

Langfelder v. Universal Laboratories, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 1, 1947No. 9329PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIGGS, Circuit Judge.

The defendant, a Delaware corporation, known as Vadsco Sales Corporation, prior to its merger on June 29, 1943 pursuant to Section 59 1 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware with its wholly owned subsidiary Delletrez, Inc., also a Delaware corporation, was sued by the plaintiffs, citizens of New York, holders of 320 shares of the former 7% preferred stock of Vads- co, for a money judgment for alleged breach of the provisions of Article IV(g) 2 of Vadseo’s charter. Jurisdiction in the case is based on diversity. After answer, no genuine issue of fact being presented,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
  3. Keller v. Wilson Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1936
  4. Porges v. Vadsco Sales Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1943
  5. Hottenstein v. York Ice MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rothschild International Corp. v. Liggett Group Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Shields v. ShieldsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1985
  3. Lillian S. Rauch v. Rca Corporation, General Electric Company and Gesub, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Sheats v. BowenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1970
  5. Bove v. Community Hotel Corp. of Newport, RISupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API