Legal Opinion

Baltimore County v. Penn

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 17, 1986No. 585, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

This case involves two former Baltimore County police officers, appellees Charles Penn and Wayne Henninger, who were granted accidental disability retirement benefits. Appellant, Baltimore County, thinks they did not deserve such generous treatment. The principal legal question presented is the nature and effect of a presumption contained in the County’s disability retirement law.

The law in question consists of §§ 20-22 and 20-22.1 of the Baltimore County Code. Those provisions read as follows:

Sec. 20-22. Accidental disability benefit.

Upon the application of a member [of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. FabritzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission v. Mayor of RockvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Commissioner, Baltimore City Police Department v. CasonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Hope v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  5. Montgomery County Fire Board v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dawson's Charter Service v. ChinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. Robinson v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Thomas v. STATE RETIREMENT AND PENSION SYSTEMCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API