Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. North Carolina Mutual Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1984No. 8318DC1067PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant contends the court should have granted its motion for judgment on the pleadings because the complaint revealed that plaintiff-wife experienced symptoms of her “sickness” before the policy was issued. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleged that plaintiff-wife experienced leg pains in June 1981, and that the problem which ultimately led to her hospitalization for exploratory surgery on 8 October 1981 caused these pains. Defendant issued its medical insurance policy to plaintiffs on 12 July 1981. The policy covered “sickness contracted while this policy is in force.”

Our Supreme…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Hodges v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Callicutt v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Price v. State Capital Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. US Piping, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Whiteside Estates, Inc. v. Highlands Cove, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Washington v. HortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Porterfield v. GoldkuhleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Davis v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Robinson v. ShueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API