Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gallagher v. Schmidt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 26, 1923No. Gen. No. 28,049Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThomson, J.

In my opinion the trial court erred in sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to the ninth plea. The plaintiff could not recover a judgment against the defendant in this suit unless he wps in fact the bona fide owner of the Filicetti judgment. Even assuming that the declaration properly alleged that plaintiff was such bona fide owner that the assignment therein set forth was to that effect, the ninth plea directly denied that allegation and alleged the contrary. It tendered an issue of fact on a vital point of the plaintiff’s case. The defendant is entitled to a trial on that issue. The plea should…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Valley National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Bippus v. VailAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  3. Illinois Flower Box Co. v. DunnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API