Legal Opinion
Hogan v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 14, 1984No. 12106-5-IPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
— Laura and Daniel Hogan appeal from an order granting summary judgment dismissing their medical malpractice claim for want of personal jurisdiction over respondents.
In 1974, appellant Laura Hogan obtained medical services for birth control procedures from Dr. Keith R. Johnson in El Cajon, California. Prior to consultation with Dr. Johnson, Mrs. Hogan had used an IUD. After meeting with Dr. Johnson, Mrs. Hogan decided that she would undergo surgery for a tubal coagulation and a D & C procedure. She alleges that she advised Dr. Johnson and El Cajon Valley Hospital that she had an IUD inserted…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Tyee Construction Co. v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Mina Wright v. James YackleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kostal v. Pinkus Dermatopathology Laboratory, P.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Grange Insurance Ass'n v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Lewis v. BoursWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Mbm Fisheries v. Bollinger MacHine Shop and ShipyardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Yates v. MuirIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.