Legal Opinion
Deshotel v. Berryhill
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 22, 2018No. 17–CV–6274LPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DISCUSSION
An ALJ applies a well-established five-step evaluation process to determine whether a claimant is disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act, familiarity with which is presumed. See Bowen v. City of New York , 476 U.S. 467, 470-71, 106 S.Ct. 2022, 90 L.Ed.2d 462 (1986). The Commissioner's decision that plaintiff is not disabled must be affirmed if it is supported by substantial evidence, and if the ALJ has applied the correct legal standards. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) ; Machadio v. Apfel , 276 F.3d 103, 108 (2d Cir. 2002).
Here, the ALJ determined that plaintiff has suffered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Patricia MacHadio v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Hooper v. ColvinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dye v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
- Alisa F. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2026
- Cogswell v. KijakaziDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- Cooks-Sanders v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Cutre, Jr. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2024
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.