Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Franke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 2019No. CC CV080485 (CA A152333) (SC S064876)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

*352**314Petitioner in this post-conviction proceeding was tried on charges of first-degree sexual abuse and first-degree sodomy in 2001. At trial, petitioner's counsel did not object to certain testimony, and controlling case law at that time from the Court of Appeals held that such testimony was admissible. In 2009, however, the Supreme Court held that that testimony was not admissible. In his post-conviction complaint, petitioner alleged that his trial counsel had failed to provide constitutionally adequate assistance and that he had been prejudiced as a result.

The Court of Appeals affirmed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Krummacher v. GierloffOregon Supreme Court · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. FrankeOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. Hernandez-EstebanOregon Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Davis v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. Pike v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. LomackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API